Funding
  • About
  • Process
    • Funding process
      • Process information
      • Process rate of change
      • Process rankings of importance
      • Delegating process decisions
      • Process complexity
    • Funding process differences
  • Approaches
    • Token funding vs network funding
      • Circular economy ideas
      • Web2 protocols & software library examples
      • Ecosystem funding factors for consideration
      • Token funding
      • Network funding
      • Funding the network, protocol and application layers
    • Contribution approaches
      • Contribution factors for consideration
      • Fully combined submission
      • Idea & contributor combined submissions
      • Independent submissions
      • Funding process data handling
    • Decision approaches
      • Decision factors for consideration
      • Fully combined decision
      • Idea & contributor combined decision
      • Independent decisions
      • Passive idea selection
      • Delegated idea selection
      • Contributor vs voter idea selection
    • Incentive approaches
      • Unsuitable incentive approaches
      • Incentive factors for consideration
      • Priority milestone incentives
      • Priority time incentives
      • Idea milestone incentives
      • Idea time incentives
      • Contributor time incentives
      • Idea cost approaches
        • Idea cost factors for consideration
        • Costs attached to contributors
        • Costs attached to ideas
        • Independent idea costs process
      • Proposal submission incentives
      • Maintenance of information incentives
    • Contribution verification approaches
      • Contribution verification factors for consideration
      • Task milestone based contribution logs
      • Project time based contribution logs
      • Individual time based contribution logs
    • Impact measurement approaches
      • Ecosystem areas for impact measurement
      • Contributors areas for impact measurement
      • Impact measuring factors for consideration
      • Priority impact measurement
      • Idea impact measurement
      • Contributor impact measurement
  • Knowledge
    • Knowledge process
  • Priorities
    • Priority process
  • Ideas
    • Idea process
    • Idea ownership approaches
      • Idea ownership factors for consideration
      • Owned ideas with fixed leadership
      • Owned ideas with distributed decisions
      • Shared ideas with elected leadership
      • Shared ideas with emergent leadership
    • Idea execution considerations
      • Idea examples
  • Contributors
    • Contributor process
    • Self sovereign identity opportunities
  • Contributions
    • Contribution verification
      • Current landscape
      • Recording & measuring contribution efforts
      • Individual monthly contribution logs
  • Outcome influence
    • Voter preferences & opinions
    • Voter outcome influence
  • Incentives
    • Proposal submission incentive approaches
    • Contribution incentive approaches
  • Impact
    • Creating impactful outcomes
  • đź”—Links
    • Treasuries
    • Income
    • Governance
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Approaches
  2. Incentive approaches
  3. Idea cost approaches

Independent idea costs process

PreviousCosts attached to ideasNextProposal submission incentives

Last updated 10 months ago

Overview

An independent idea costs process means that idea related costs are handled separately from any voting that supports or rejects any suggested ideas. An already supported idea could submit further idea related costs for consideration to the community. A separate idea cost process could function in a multitude of ways depending on the requirements of the ecosystem. As one example some funding processes could decide to automatically include and approve idea related costs when the request value being requested is small. Those ecosystems could then adopt an independent approval process for situations where those costs exceed a certain value.

Very low idea cost budgeting complexity (Score - 5)

Idea costs don’t need to be fully planned upfront. An initial idea suggestion could focus on what they are able to plan and estimate at the time of submission. When other estimated costs can be more accurately determined those requests could be submitted at the point in which more accurate justifications and evidence can be provided. This approach helps to increase the timeliness and accuracy of any idea cost requests.

Low idea cost change complexity (Score - 4)

At any point the contributors involved in an idea could request a change to the costs required for any part of an idea. A separate idea cost process could handle these requests in any way that makes sense for the ecosystem. For instance the purpose, usage and beneficiary details could all be part of the idea cost request. The policies for how idea cost funding can be requested and updated could be very different across each ecosystem. The main concern with having an independent process is if this process is used often it could increase the overall complexity to handle idea cost changes by having too much flexibility. An ecosystem could obviously put limits on how often a proposer could request for changes if this flexibility in handling idea costs became a growing problem.

Very high voter expressiveness (Score - 5)

Voters would be able to indicate their exact preferences on any of the requested funds for idea related costs. The ecosystem could also decide that the community only needs to be involved in idea costs that go above a certain amount being requested. Anything below that could be automatically approved and determined by the selected contributors. The funding could come from a set budget that is made available for idea costs.

Total score = 14 / 15