Funding
  • About
  • Process
    • Funding process
      • Process information
      • Process rate of change
      • Process rankings of importance
      • Delegating process decisions
      • Process complexity
    • Funding process differences
  • Approaches
    • Token funding vs network funding
      • Circular economy ideas
      • Web2 protocols & software library examples
      • Ecosystem funding factors for consideration
      • Token funding
      • Network funding
      • Funding the network, protocol and application layers
    • Contribution approaches
      • Contribution factors for consideration
      • Fully combined submission
      • Idea & contributor combined submissions
      • Independent submissions
      • Funding process data handling
    • Decision approaches
      • Decision factors for consideration
      • Fully combined decision
      • Idea & contributor combined decision
      • Independent decisions
      • Passive idea selection
      • Delegated idea selection
      • Contributor vs voter idea selection
    • Incentive approaches
      • Unsuitable incentive approaches
      • Incentive factors for consideration
      • Priority milestone incentives
      • Priority time incentives
      • Idea milestone incentives
      • Idea time incentives
      • Contributor time incentives
      • Idea cost approaches
        • Idea cost factors for consideration
        • Costs attached to contributors
        • Costs attached to ideas
        • Independent idea costs process
      • Proposal submission incentives
      • Maintenance of information incentives
    • Contribution verification approaches
      • Contribution verification factors for consideration
      • Task milestone based contribution logs
      • Project time based contribution logs
      • Individual time based contribution logs
    • Impact measurement approaches
      • Ecosystem areas for impact measurement
      • Contributors areas for impact measurement
      • Impact measuring factors for consideration
      • Priority impact measurement
      • Idea impact measurement
      • Contributor impact measurement
  • Knowledge
    • Knowledge process
  • Priorities
    • Priority process
  • Ideas
    • Idea process
    • Idea ownership approaches
      • Idea ownership factors for consideration
      • Owned ideas with fixed leadership
      • Owned ideas with distributed decisions
      • Shared ideas with elected leadership
      • Shared ideas with emergent leadership
    • Idea execution considerations
      • Idea examples
  • Contributors
    • Contributor process
    • Self sovereign identity opportunities
  • Contributions
    • Contribution verification
      • Current landscape
      • Recording & measuring contribution efforts
      • Individual monthly contribution logs
  • Outcome influence
    • Voter preferences & opinions
    • Voter outcome influence
  • Incentives
    • Proposal submission incentive approaches
    • Contribution incentive approaches
  • Impact
    • Creating impactful outcomes
  • 🔗Links
    • Treasuries
    • Income
    • Governance
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Approaches
  2. Incentive approaches
  3. Idea cost approaches

Costs attached to ideas

PreviousCosts attached to contributorsNextIndependent idea costs process

Last updated 10 months ago

Overview

Keeping idea costs attached to idea suggestions means that these costs would need to be requested in the idea proposal itself. Each of the idea costs would be accounted for and included in the same approval as the idea itself.

Moderate idea cost budgeting complexity (Score - 3)

Each of the idea related costs can be budgeted for in the idea proposal. This can be fine for some of the costs that an idea might have however some costs could change over time or be difficult to calculate ahead of time without further execution effort. This means it can be moderately difficult for contributors to accurately budget for these idea costs ahead of time.

Moderate idea cost change complexity (Score - 3)

To change the existing idea related costs or to add new ones a contributor either needs to estimate all of these costs upfront in the initial idea proposal or withhold those requests entirely until a future repeated idea proposal. Creating a future idea proposal for this purpose adds extra complexity for the voters who then need to approve multiple similar instances of the same idea and this also increases the effort for contributors to handle these repeated submissions.

Low voter expressiveness (Score - 2)

The grouped costs could be easily listed out when the costs are directly attached to the idea however there is still little ability for the voter to properly express their preference in a vote and can only do this by sharing their feedback and opinions on the idea itself. The voters either have to accept everything or nothing.

Total score = 8 / 15